You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Re-Framing the Debate(s) Around the 9/11 Cover-Up [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
graphixtech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 07:13 AM
Original message
Re-Framing the Debate(s) Around the 9/11 Cover-Up
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Nov-26-07 08:01 AM by graphixtech
He Who Defines, Wins

It's rather like the strategic energy at play in a sports game.
Frame it so citizens are on the defense and it weakens the offensive.

Fortunately, re-framing/re-claiming the debate is a fairly simple thing to do.
1. Winning means winning the uncommitted center
2. Moderate or marginalize your opponent
3. Choose your battles wisely, so as to argue on your turf and not his
4. When forced to argue on his turf, re frame the debate in terms
favorable to you
(and post ADDITIONAL information or resources for other readers to follow up with-jh)

Re-framing the Debate

For an example of practice techniques to reclaim the 9-11 debate,
see my replies in this thread:
9/11 Truth Movement: Looking for Truth, or Promoting Theories by Any Means Necessary?

BRADY: Progressives must redefine debate - (see related caution below re: 9/11 movement)

Please watch the video of "Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza and Bob McIlvaine.
They speak for their loved one and their voices refreshingly pure.

Recent videos of other 9/11 family members are in this thread:

public relations cautionary note

"For effective immediate change, please also consider that reclaiming
our individual identities as an American citizen serves to both
motivate other citizen's interest and is a genuine identity not
easily targeted for potential destruction."

"I am increasingly suspicous that the identity "9/11 truth movement"
is in a highly vulnerable PR position. An intuitive/observation vision
is of a near future, predictable headline that reads "The Rise & Fall
of the 9/11 Truth Movement" (and thus the 9/11 issues)."

"Media main focus on the meme "the 9/11 truth movement ... yadda yadda yadda"
both serves as a distraction that trivializes the 9/11 cataclysm
and furthers a singular vulnerability for potential destruction.
If an event were to occur, backlash could be severe. At this point
in America's post 9-11 history, main focus the messenger rather
than the MESSAGE is simply illogical, inappropriate or unethical,
depending on intent."

Mrs. Jan Hoyer, November 26, 2007
citizen, founding graphic designer of the national 9-11 truth movement,,
(these views are my own and not representative of any organization)

Public resources:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC