You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #29: the other two links ? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
RH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. the other two links ?
Upon what basis should anybody be convinced by the Riyadh report?


Dealing largely with a more immediate event, re. 9/11 it appears to present a second hand conclusion with no discussion of any evidence.


The Atta will appears to have been dated 1996, hardly therfore valid as evidence of character let alone any connection to events that took place 5 years later.


The "written by a terrorist of the worst kind" comment is spurious.


The picture that emerges from it nothing more than a tendancy towards a fanatical indulgence.


So what else is new?


Was this supposed to be the best available evidence?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC