Reply #49: But I have analyzed this...

[Factfinder General]

at length. I've shown you some of my links. Purdue's simulation is unscientific. The various films of the planes cutting through the WTC buildings are unscientific also. No matter what has been said by witnesses or what film of the events exist, the fact remains that those planes cannot have behaved in the manner the official position declared they did. Science completely backs this up. take an egg and shoot it through a cannon at your car door and see what happens to it. That would be a more valid comparative test. What do you seriously think would happen? Heck, just try and throw an egg as hard as you can through some cardboard. Use a catapult if you want to add velocity. Though I don't say it is the same, the relative impact power of an egg versus a steel sheet door is closer to that which would exist between a Boeing 767 and the WTC Towers.

Aluminum based aircraft cannot penetrate massively dense targets. History, as well as science, backs this up. Never in the whole history of aviation, other than what was alleged to have happened on 9/11, has any plane completely penetrated a dense target. There has been thousands of such crashes in all types of circumstances. Planes have never behaved that way in history. Planes have never before sunk themselves completely into the ground as one was alleged to have done in PA. Fiberglass nose cones have never before penetrated six reinforced, military grade walls as one apparently did at the Pentagon. Planes have never before just been swallowed up whole by steel framed buildings as the ones in New York.

Are you not just a little suspicious that the only time this has happened was on that fateful day, a day riddled with more anomalies than there are gnats in a florida swamp?