Reply #233: fake rob, with no real conclusions on 9/11, what debate?

[superbeachnut]

Rob, you have no conclusions to discuss. Your want your data to prove 77 did not hit the Pentagon but you never want to own up to it. Are you challenged on making decisions too? You have proved your knowledge base is flawed with errors in the number of feet in a nautical mile, false statements all over your web site, and the lack of knowledge in avionics as in radar altimeter, not knowing what frequency range it works at. How can you analyze stuff and have no idea what you are working with.

It comes down to the fact you have to ignore thousands of pieces of evidence to try to say the stuff you are not saying. What is your conclusion. You have zero final conclusions, why? What kind of fraud are you up to? No conclusion, just making up junk about 9/11. Notice how Rob never makes that final conclusion. Why?

(now rob is going around saying a FDR can not be more than .5 second of delayed data or some thing like the unsinkable Titanic, tell rob the Titanic sunk, and anyone can see from other accidents many seconds of data are missing in an unsinkable system, that never misses data! why is rob so challenged on the facts about everything? look at his argument, please explain what saying the data can not be missing helps you when the data is missing?! How can someone say it can't happen when it did? Yes, rob, sometimes things do not work, ships sink that are unsinkable and data is not stored due to big problems, or system operations you will never be able to understand. Believe me Rob, anyone who has shown as many flaws in knowledge about aircraft terms and symbols as you, will never grasp the complicated system associated with the FDR)

Weak, Rob you supplied the final data point before the FDR data ended some 3000 feet away from the Pentagon. 1.5 DME from DCA and the final headings were 61.2 true track, and 71.4 magnetic track. Even the winds confirm the FDR data on the heading/track information. All from your own site.

Yes the final position recorded on the FDR, the last bits of decoded data were 1.5 DME from DCA, and 61.2 true track, 71.4 magnetic track. From p4t. They take real data, and then try to make up non conclusions. I know Rob is confused because he can not plot 1.4 DME from DCA and draw a line at 61.2 true/71.4 magnetic track.

A kid can do it, but the experts make up junk, they do not produce any truth. Go ahead super pilot Rob, plot your own stuff! He can not do it! Can't do it! Challenged or just a fraud trying to make money. Which is it?