Reply #122: Great post, Demo Dude!!!

[Dancing_Dave]

I first heard the tanker theory at the old Peoples Investigation of 911 site. It was advanced, on the basis of photographic evidence, by a very intelligent, observant and open-minded British aviation buff who went by the name of "Ronboy" there. It's definately one of the most probable theories I've heard, much more likely than the "official version".

But the idea that what we can see under the wing of that plane is some kind of missile or bomb, also has quite a lot going for it. We may need some kind of leak or clue from someone who actually knew about this covert operation, before we know which of these two theories is correct. A combination of the two could also be right--say it was a tanker with plenty of fuel to make a spectacular explosion show on TV, with some kind of missile or bomb involved in creating the effect as well.

The evidence concerning "Flight Termination Systems" is very relevant too. This was also discussed at that smart 'ol Peoples Investigation of 911 site, I sure wish it was still around. There I met the very smart NYC accountant Jamie who first revealed mafiosio Paul Gargano of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey as a key player in the whole 9/11 deal!

But please be careful about attributin to much to Zionism or Israel.
The Bush Regime neo-cons did it, they could call on some help from their wealthy friends in Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan. But these neo-cons themselves are responsible for the disaster. It couldn't have been done without "inside" help at the top of the U.S. Whitehouse and Pentagon. In no way did Israel, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan put their heads together and come up with this "behind our backs". Balderdash!!!