You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

The 757 plus bomb theory [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
demodewd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 08:33 PM
Original message
The 757 plus bomb theory
Advertisements [?]
The 757 plus bomb theory


This theory is the nearer to the official version. It would probably be the only one presented if there had not been an attempt of covering up something from the authorities. It's also the simpler to describe and understand.

The Boeing 757 of American Airlines, registered 644 AA, fleet number 5 BP, is prepared during the night of september 10, for it's flight of the morning.
A broach technology bomb, as the one seen on the following image, is loaded in the luggage compartment. The front part, knowing that the guiding sytem is not necessary, could be replaced by something smaller.

On 11 septembre morning, this Boeing embarks sixty passengers and crew members and takes off from Washington Dulles.
The plane is remotely piloted and / or it is hijacked by Hani Hanjour and fellows.
This plane is crashed on the Pentagon.
The wings go forward in the crash, folding along the fuselage, thus limiting the size of the damage on the front to an extend smaller than the wingspan of the 757.
The bomb inside explodes while the plane is entering the building, creating some important damage near the entry point and shreading the rear part of the plane into small pieces.
The uranium mass penetrates the building, making tremendous but limited in size damage, and exits the building through "punch out" hole, ending it's course in the A-E drive.

Arguments for the "757 plus bomb" theory

It's the more coherent with the witnesses accounts. Some of them, having a good point of view and / or familiar with airplanes, described this folding of the wings.
The damage on the light poles are coherent with the wingspan of a 757.
The damage on the fence, generator, small wall of the ventilation structure, fit exactly the position of the engines of a 757.
The damage on the pentagon's front fit well the size of a 757 if the wings folded along the body. The plane, rolled slightly to the left (as witnesses accounted) touches the building with it's nose at the first floor level (3 m above ground) between pillars 13 and 14. The left wing, touching the ground, extends it's damage, ripping the wall, up to pillar 8. The right wing damage the limit first-second floor, the tip striking the second floor wall and window up to pillar 20.
The damage inside the building is coherent with the assumed trajectories of the two engines (knowing that the wings folding movement deflect them), and with the trajectory of the uranium mass.
The explosion of the bomb was probably clearly visible on the images, which pushed the authorities not to show them and, therefore, publish faked images from the cctv camera.

Arguments against the "757 plus bomb" theory

The noise of a 757 is not specially strident. This perception by the witnesses could be due to the fact that some were close from the plane and this one was at full throttle, a not so frequent situation for people who don't work in airports.
The tip of the starboard wing should have damaged the front between pillars 20 and 21.
The letters of the "American" logo found on some debris and shown on pictures have no reason to be smaller after the crash than they were on the fuselage of N 644 AA plane. If the "757" hypothese is true, the pictures showing these "too small" letters must be fakeries of the same sort than the cctv camera images.
The conspiracy couldn't be the fact of Al Quaeda alone : one of the states having the technologies of depleted uranium and / or broach bombs must be party to it.
Loading such a bomb inside the luggage compartment of a plane on Washington Dulles airport requires a high degree of complicity on the airport's technical personnel.
If the target was the Pentagon and the attacked programmed in a raze to the ground flight, it's not clear why an uranium bomb was added inside the plane, except if we credit the thesis that this attack had for target a meeting room located deep inside the first floor of the west aisle of the Pentagon, where a meeting was held with the top officiers of the "Naval Intelligence". It would be more realistic if the initial target (missed) was the White House, the attacked programmed in a steep descent, and the target of the uranium bomb was the underground bunker under the White House. As Dick Cheney and Condoleeza Rice were directed to this bunker "manu militari" by security personnel during the attack, they were close to experiment what an uranium attack on a bunker does, as could some of the personnels of the Navy inside the Pentagon, or hundreds of iraqis who had found a shelter in a parking in Bagdad during the first gulf war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC