Debunkers always use that. Either it's this or that.
Have you read the BBC's official response? They did not state that it was an error of omission. They simply said it was a "mistake" with no further explanation. So the simplest explanation is that they received a press release and ran with it without checking the facts. Then the obvious question is who gave them the press release?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
