You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #52: Exactly. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
StrictlyRockers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
52. Exactly.
You have GOT to be kidding me with this response!

"We're not part of a conspiracy."

Why in the world would you say something as stupid as this to start off? Who accused you of being part of a conspiracy? Independent investigators are sticking to the facts, and we requested some kind clarification. This blanket denial of involvement in 9/11 is just lame.

This is like a parent asking, "Johnny, do you know why the house is flooded?" and the little kid saying, "I don't know anything about the broken faucet in the kitchen! I didn't leave the hammer under the sink!". Jeeze, I don't think the Beeb was "in on it", but could you guys possibly issue a denial that makes you seem less guilty? Ugh!

What ARE you hiding? It is totally irresponsible for the head of BBC World to misrepresent independent investigators' claims. He should be sacked. We will continue to focus on the evidence. They can keep issuing denials if they feel it is appropriate.

Next.

"We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening."

OMG! What a complete gem!! WTF??! We KNOW that they were told in advance that WTC 7 was going to fall down. So was CNN. To deny this is just plain ridiculous. If, say, the fire department thought that WTC 7 was going to collapse, or that the ceiling was going to fall, then they might very well release a public statement. Some of them may have talked to reporters and that information got back to the BBC.

The point is WE KNOW THAT THEY WERE TOLD IN ADVANCE. But the BBC doesn't make that claim. They claim that they have lost all their 9/11 tapes and that they never received word that WTC 7 was going to collapse ahead of time. Then how did they know to make the announcement over and over again that it had collapsed? Clearly it had not. Are they trying to get us to believe that the two reporters in the video just magically came up with this information on their own? WHAT??!

You lost the original tapes??! Ya rite, buddy!!

What a load of shite.

Lastly, their final defense to all of this is to quote "some guy on Youtube"???!!! Some anonymous poster on Youtube is their go-to guy for a defense regarding evidence of an insider conspiracy on 9/11? Who are these people and why do they think we will let them get away with this nonsense?

SR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC