Reply #87: The irony is that I could say the same exact thing about what you are doing

[spooked911]

I think I can understand perspective a little better than you, since at least I didn't try to measure the width of the crater by drawing a line from foreground to center-ground and then using a constant unit of measurement.


I can understand that in the diagram with thin yellow lines representing the plane, that the only way your model makes sense is if the fuselage only made a 1 foot depression when it hit, plus that the plane came down at a 90 degree angle.


I at least can understand that the nose of a Boeing 757 can't impact the ground at 600 mph and only make a 1 foot depression.

I can understand that in your diagram showing the plane from the side, with the plane coming in from above, the port wing DOES NOT GO INTO THE CRATER IF YOU FOLLOW THE TRAJECTORY.

You have been sooooooooooo wrong throughout this whole "debate", it is not even funny.

It is in fact scary to see someone who so willfully cannot see how wrong they are.



You can call me crazy all you like, but you are the one who can't seem to understand my argument. You simply have not mounted a coherent rebuttal to my diagram.

Maybe you are not being intentionally intellectually dishonest, so I have to assume you just are not capable of understanding the concepts here and you are being blinded by some warped sense of patriotism.