Reply #40: I asked you some direct questions, and as usual you duck and dodge.

[William Seger]

> So how could you know what Truthers think?

Try to keep up; I just told you: "truthers" are constantly coming here to tell us what they think and why they think it.

> There are many rational reasons for being a Truther. Chief among them is the vast evidence of a vast cover-up.

In the first place, there is no such "vast evidence of a vast cover-up" -- that's mere begging of the question -- but the more serious problem with your statement is that what "truthers" actually do is take their paranoid suspicions and elevate them to be "truth" based on nothing but what Kaleko calls their "innate navigator" and then claim that the reason they can't prove this "truth" is because of a vast cover-up. No, that is not rational to think that if the CIA covered up what they knew about the Saudis, then they also brought down the towers with superdoopernanothermite.

> And here, 10 years later, you admit that it is a very serious matter. Where have you been for these 10 years? What have you, Seger, been thinking all this time? All this time the cover-up is nothing, but now it is suddenly a 'serious matter'?

You are so full of crap, BeFree, that it's impossible to take you seriously. While the "truth movement" has been chasing after idiotic theories about fake hijackings and controlled demolitions, many people including myself have pointed out that you're nothing but a pathological and pathetic distraction from the real issues of 9/11. If you have suddenly come to appreciate one of them, that would indeed be progress, but I predict that you will soon return to your idiotic theories about fake hijackings and controlled demolitions.