Reply #178: The only one in this conversation demanding anything is you.

[Make7]

 

lovepg wrote:

Oh and prove your wild assertion much less than HALF THE JET FUEL WAS CONSUMED IN THE FIREBALL OUTSIDE THE BUILDING

Notice how your choice of words makes that sound like a demand. In my previous responses I said that you should have no problem providing something from the NIST report if it was actually there as you claimed. Stating that you should be able to find and provide something from a source merely means that you could easily produce it should you be so inclined. (It does not mean I had any expectation that you would actually do so.) I also asked you if you were planning on proving the assertion about "half the plane" exiting WTC2. Based on your latest reply I have to assume that you have no intention of even trying to provide any basis for your assertion other than your own biased opinion.

lovepg wrote:

Sound like me? Don't flatter yourself.

Previously in this thread:

lovepg wrote:

Its NISTs imagination read the report. Oh no I am sounding like an official story person..

I wrote:

Its NISTs assertion read the report. Oh no I am sounding like you...

Surely you can see the similarities between those two quotes. (And honestly I doubt if anyone would think sounding like you would be the least bit flattering.)

If you would be willing to attempt to establish some actual basis for your statement about "half the plane" exiting WTC2, I would be willing to reciprocate by telling you where in the NIST report you can find the information I posted about. Of course you searching for something in the NIST report is a relatively simple task compared to me trying to figure out how on earth you could come up with some of the things I have seen in your posts.

- Make7
WTC1: (B)  6 core columns severed, 3 heavily damaged; (A) 3 severed, 4 heavily damaged (pdf page 164, NCSTAR 1)
WTC2: (D) 10 core columns severed, 1 heavily damaged; (C) 5 severed, 4 heavily damaged (pdf page 165, NCSTAR 1)