You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #116: Let's restrict ourselves to the claims that were made, shall we? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #91
116. Let's restrict ourselves to the claims that were made, shall we?
Edited on Mon Dec-05-11 08:22 AM by Euromutt
As opposed to tactic so common among Republican presidential candidates of answering the question you wanted the moderator to ask rather than the question he actually asked.

In the OP, ileus asserted that "If you carry a loaded gun - you are ready, willing and able to save someone with it."
Bowens43 asserted in response that it's "more likely someone you love will die from that gun."
In other words, bowens43 asserts that, if you carry a loaded gun, it's more likely that that gun will be used--intentionally or otherwise--to kill a loved one than to "save someone."

Or, are you saying that the gun owner is more likely to save the life of another than lose the life of a loved one by that gun?

See, there you're assuming that "to save someone" only means "to save the life of another." However, we could just as readily include instances in which a person was saved from being the victim of a completed physical assault, robbery, or sexual assault/rape, all of which are classed as violent crimes. Even if none of these incidents, if successfully completed, need have resulted in the victim's death, they would result in material harm to the victim, and we should treat any such result being averted as a positive outcome.

While it's impossible to definitely know the number of successful DGUs against violent crimes that occur annually, all the available data indicate that that number is higher in the US than the total number of people killed due to GSWs. Even if you buy the NCVS numbers, which are almost certainly way too low, there are at least seven times as many people "saved" by guns than die from GSWs. Thus, bowens43's claim must be false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC