You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would a ban on handguns constitute prohibition? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Starboard Tack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 02:27 PM
Original message
Would a ban on handguns constitute prohibition?
Advertisements [?]
Does the right to carry handguns decrease violent crime or does it increase it? I see no evidence that it does either.
Violent crime has always existed and probably always will, and is driven by socio-economic factors, not by individual rights, or lack thereof.

So, what is the point in debating it? Well, the problem is not violent crime, per se, but the tools used to commit the majority of these crimes. Handguns. 75% of firearm homicides are committed with handguns.

Gun-related homicide rates in the United States are twenty to thirty-five times higher than they are in countries that are economically and politically similar to us.

Some argue that the answer is to enforce or increase existing legislation.
Others say our 2A rights outweigh any potential saving of lives through restricting those rights.
Others say all guns should be banned.
Some deny the existence of a problem, because they find the thousands of gun deaths statistically insignificant.
I think all reasonable people recognize we have a serious problem. Where we differ is in finding a solution.
There is no easy solution, but there is a well recognized problem and that is the proliferation of handguns. The greater the proliferation, the easier the access, regardless of legislation.

Toters tend to lean strongly libertarian and share a philosophy that individual rights trump the greater good. Ayn Rand would be proud of them. They offer no solutions beyond expansion of RTC, which IMO, is no solution at all, because it ignores the underlying social problem.

I am not a supporter of the Second Amendment, because it has been broadened and distorted from it's original intent, which was to support local militias, and no longer applies. I do believe in an individual's right to own and use firearms for hunting and defense of home and family.
Long guns are quite adequate for those purposes.

So, that leaves the problem of “How to eradicate handguns from our society.”

I know some purists see this as prohibition, but it really isn't any more prohibitive than restrictions imposed by the EPA and other government agencies.

Here are some banned cars
http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=29474&pst=1500687

We could argue the merits of each one, but banning a model or type of tool is not the same as PROHIBITION


Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC