Reply #34: tut, tut, iverglas

[TPaine7]

Haven't you picked up by now that sources like the one quoted in the OP almost always lie about guns?

And I see you haven't learned anything about water, yet, have you? So sad--you actually think the "water is wet" comment makes you look good. Wow.

Well I'm sure you've heard the reasons why "micro-stamping" is a significant burden to manufacturers, but no doubt you've forgotten them by now. (Like you've probably forgotten that all nine justices of the US Supreme Court agreed that there is a right to self-defense, or that the Fifth Amendment doesn't require a person to flee their own home when they can safely do so rather than stand their ground against a deadly threat, or that "unalienable" doesn't mean "not subject to forfeiture," or that "keep and bear arms" doesn't imply anything about a "collectivity".)

So, just for you, here's a refresher:

Early stage technology in the conceptual phase with one patented vendor and no commercially available equipment. Also cost prohibitive, inefficient, and counter-productive to traditional forensics:
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/JUDdata/Tmy/2008SB-00607-R000317-Colt%27s%20Manufacturing%20Co.%20LLC,%20Carlton%20S.%20Chen-TMY.PDF