You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #129: The decision was based on California state law and well-established precedent [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #126
129. The decision was based on California state law and well-established precedent
Edited on Thu Jan-20-11 05:18 PM by slackmaster
A law that is so vague that nobody can explain exactly what it means does not pass Constitutional muster in this state. This one was so bad that the California Department of Justice, which is responsible for enforcing the law, couldn't answer direct, specific questions about what was covered and what was not.

Maybe your state would allow it, but mine does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC