Reply #58: Uh...what are you yammering about?

[beevul]

"Meanwhile, the bigoted and misogynistic insult attempted in this little subthread just fell danged flat, dinnit?"


What is it exactly, that you are referring to that is a "bigoted and misogynistic insult attempted"?

"your attentions are needed by several people here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

A whole lot of them don't have any more sympathy than I do. Some of them actually revel."

(Of course, where sympathy is concerned, you make no distinction between sympathy for a so called "gun militant" versus sympathy for those that threaten people and commit violent crimes. COLOUR me shocked lol.)


Naw. I figure I'll wait until you start blathering on about the rights of the people killed as described in that OP, we both know you can hardly resist doing so. Then I'll call you out for being the hypocrite you are. Not doing so makes you a hypocrite as evidenced in the thread you linked. Doing so makes you a hypocrite in the thread I linked. You know, because "live by the gun, die by the gun" only applies to "gun militants", not to people committing crimes as far as you appear to be concerned.


You should have been a painter, rather than a legal...whatever...You have a penchant for painting yourself into corners.

:rofl:

The more I read your posts, the clearer it becomes why you so seldom make your position known - because it is almost always based on what suits your argument and almost never based on consistant principle.


This post is just another example shining a light brightly on what most of us already knew.