You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #5: Nonetheless PA used "inalienable" and VT used "unalienable" as adjectives in identical sentences. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nonetheless PA used "inalienable" and VT used "unalienable" as adjectives in identical sentences.
Both PA and VT meant the right in question could not be given away by a citizen and government did not have the authority to take away that right.

Of course we know governments do have the power to take away a natural right but that's not authority.

It's up to We the People to make certain government does not illegally use its power to take away natural, inalienable/unalienable rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC