You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: not really [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. not really
the case law says they have no legal duty to protect any specific individual

it does not therefore follow that they CANNOT PROTECT YOU.

it merely means they (as you state in your second sentence) they have NO duty not to protect individuals (not in custody AND that they have not established certain relationsip with (such as dispatcher telling person something specific as to response etc. etc)

police can and do frequently protect people.

i have taken kicks to the head protecting people and suffered smoke inhalation pulling people from a building so don't tell me we CANNOT protect you.

cops can and do. routinely

as for THIS case, that wasn't a cop. that was a COP-O-CRAT

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC