You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What About Hydrocarbon combustion WITHOUT CO2? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 03:36 AM
Original message
What About Hydrocarbon combustion WITHOUT CO2?
Advertisements [?]
So I got curious today, looking into how carbon fiber was made (trying to figure out why it was so damned expensive) and I came upon this chemical reaction for PAN, a precursor of valuable carbon fiber:
2CH3-CH=CH2 + 2NH3 + 3O2 → 2CH2=CH-C≡N + 6H2O
This reaction is exothermic, it outputs no C02 but a lot of heat - the core thing needed to produce energy or turn a motor. The input is propylene (and ammonia). Propylene is a hydrocarbon, another fruit of the oil drum and like the rest its combustible. Its normal combustion equation is
C3H8 + 5O2 ---> 3CO2 + 4H2O
Notice the C02, just like gasoline or anything. But in certain processes like the one I mentioned first, it appears to me that carbon can be outputted in solid forms rather than as C02, (in this case Polyacrylonitrile aka PAN) saving the environment while still releasing energy to turn a motor... (And in the case of carbon fiber production, into an INCREDIBLY valuable industrial compound to boot.)

Now I'm not a chemist or an oil guy, and I can see the reaction I am talking about certainly isn't the answer for powering cars... Papers say it outputs C02 (through a parallel process, not fundamental reaction) as well as such lovely sounding things as "hydrogen cyanide", not to mention ammonia consumption (needed for fertilizer).

Yet the dreamer in me can't help but to notice what a complete and total HOLY GRAIL hydrocarbon combustion without CO2 would be, and this reaction offers a hint that its possible. Imagine: Total reduction of greenhouse gases with no economic cost from limiting fossil fuel consumption. And honestly, this idea seems fresh: I've looked into carbon sequestration, and I see a slew of technologies that seek to actually remove existing C02 from the air, which intuitively hits me as being "putting the genie back in the bottle", more expensive and difficult in every way than not letting the genie out in the first place: having engines output a solid carbon filled industrial product rather than C02.

So my question is, has anybody here really looked at this? Hydrocarbon combustion with carbon outputted in solid form? Is there research going on? Any input or leads would be appreciated, I am having a lot of fun researching this stuff.

Thanks!
Me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC