You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: Good points. The PV panels are an expensive part but only part of the system. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Good points. The PV panels are an expensive part but only part of the system.
PV system consists of:
a) PV panels = $2.00 to $4.00 per watt right now (depending on quality, efficiency, size of system & retail markup)
b) Inverter = $0.50 to $1.00 a watt
c) Racking & Wiring = $1.00 a watt
d) labor = $1.50 to $3.00 a watt
--------------------------
Total: $5.00 to $9.00 a watt

While PV panels are likely going to continue to drop in price the other components are much more mundane. Inverters have been around for decades in a variety of aplpications and we haven't seen the price go to $0.00. Racking is little more complicated that metal beams, screws, and bolts. Prices are unlikely to go down at all (inflation in metals means price may even rise).

Labor could go down some if either:
a) it becomes so widespread that unskilled labor can be used
b) some new mechanism for deploying becomes commonplace.

However both of these require something beyond the advance of silicon to see improvement. I am certain we will see quality high end PV available for <$1.00 within four or five years. However even if PV are below the magic $1.00 watt each reduction would have less of an impact on overall system cost.

Going from $4 a watt down to $2 a watt cuts system cost by 23% but going from $2 a watt to $1 a watt only cuts system cost by another 14%. Cutting price down to $0.50 a watt is only another 8% reduction.

Solar has huge potential and installed solar capacity will only rise but predicting that we will see solar completely dominate in 16 years based on price of silicon falling is naive. It assumes:
a) silicon prices will continue to see exponential growth in yields without slowing
b) the non-silicon components will fall in cost by similar margins.

Neither are realistic and those real world conditions will make the growth in solar much slower and harder to predict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC