Reply #4: I have observed that the main strategy of "renewables will save us advocates"

[NNadir]

seems to be "If you don't know something, make it up."

You know nothing about me whatsoever. We are not friends. Therefore anything you say about me that is not relevant to what I write here is made up. If you would like to assert that I have ever supported dangerous oil, dangerous coal or dangerous natural gas, my more than 15,000 posts on this site are available as public record.

You are also invited to see if I ever said anything in favor of Reagan ever. If you cannot produce such an example, it would be reasonable to assume you are a liar.

I certainly am not a bourgeois car CULTists apologizing for dangerous natural gas and declaring it a "clean fuel."

I favor the immediate phase out of all dangerous fossil fuels, something the "renewables will save us" car CULTists have neither the guts or smarts to support.

As for so called "nuclear waste," that term is just a scientifically illiterate talking point. I understand the chemistry and physics of every nuclide, actinide, transition metal, gas and anion in used nuclear fuel. I have made clear my contention that the waste mentality should not apply to these things, but it is very hard to get that through those who are bourgeois dilettantes where scientific issues are concerned.