You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #36: Just answering the question... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Just answering the question...
Edited on Fri Oct-31-03 06:34 PM by Nederland
The question you originally asked was whether or not "these words from 1966 are safe today or whether they represent political suicide." My answer to that question was that these words are not political suicide, but empty unless you are prepared to offer a solution.

Imagine if a speaker stood up and said: "Heart disease is the number one killer of Americans. We need to solve this problem!" Now imagine if this same speaker stood up and said this exact same thing for thirty years but never added anything more. No talk of solutions, no talk of how the problem was going to be solved, merely the same old tired statement that the problem exists and something should be done about it. How well do you think the public would respond to this speaker in the long run? Do you think, maybe, just maybe, that over time they would start to tune out? Its like standing up and saying the sky is blue--the fact that its true does not make it interesting or compelling.

I think the parallels to the Democratic party here are pretty obvious.

You imply that I believe that all statements that do not specify solutions are empty. Nothing could be further from the truth. Rather, as I specifically stated in post #30, there are stages to polical rhetoric. The first stage is raising awareness of the problem, and this is the stage where statements like King's are valuable and necessary. What was valuable and necessary 30+ years ago, however, may not be valuable and necessary today.

Everybody knows that poverty is a problem. What we need to day is solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC