You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #147: The user didn't sign the votes, so it was DELIBERATE [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #145
147. The user didn't sign the votes, so it was DELIBERATE
Edited on Mon Nov-21-05 03:06 PM by DrDebug
So it was NOT visible and deliberate.

The topic reads:

New users please read: You are welcome to comment but please add your comments to the bottom of the page (not the top) and sign them by adding four tildes (~) which will automatically add your username or IP address and the time and date. Please do not alter the comments or votes of others; this is considered vandalism and grounds for blocking. Please do not comment or vote multiple times pretending you are different people; such comments and votes will be deleted or ignored. Read this for more information. Thank you.


The anonmymous user first add a first vote and today added another. BOth were unsigned so it wasn't clear. The only way to tell is by looking at the history. That means that there are a DELIBERATE attempt to vote twice by 1) not signing 2) it contained a clear message that it was not allowed

So that fall into one category and that is DELIBERATE voting for the second time. He tried to sneak a second vote in.

Entry left by the user:

KEEP Used several times this morning on The Stephanie Miller show in the 'generic' term and not a direct releation to the person in question. It's becoming just a valid term as "Swiftboating" or "Chicken Hawk".

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Schmidthead&oldid=28917234


Note that it is unsigned and a deliberate attempt at voting. Please note that both times a clear warning was visible not to perform multiple votes and this should go without saying.

So the voting fraud is PROVEN beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC