Reply #90: You wont say its the case, but I will

[onenote]

Depsite your unsupported speculation, there is absolutely no way that the recorded vote in Virginia and New Jersey reflected some dramatic understatement of the actual number of votes cast for the Democratic candidate and/or a dramatic overstatement of the votes cast for the repub. The result in Virginia was consistent with polls taken late in the campaign that showed Kaine with 50, Kilgore 45, Potts 3. The actual result was 51+ for Kaine, 46 for Kilgore and only 2 for Potts.

Similarly, Survey USA had Corzine with 50, Forrester with 44, and "other" with 5. Final results: Corzine with 52+, Forrester with a shade under 44, and other with a bit above 4 percent.

Even the polls for the California props weren't far off in most cases; where they were, the recorded votes were higher for the anti-Arnold position than the pre-election polls suggested, further evidence that there wasn't any widespread fraud.

onenote