You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

"TREASONGATE: Comey Clarifies Fitz's Plenary Authority " [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 12:29 PM
Original message
"TREASONGATE: Comey Clarifies Fitz's Plenary Authority "
Advertisements [?]
CS waves in on the busheviks legal dilemna's.

Will the unlimited wallet of poppy o get his beloved smirk out of yet another self-induced scandal?? /

"TREASONGATE: Comey Clarifies Fitzgerald's Plenary Authority
On August 8th, 2005, I wrote a very detailed legal analysis explaining why Fitzgerald cannot "legally" be fired by Bush or anybody in the DOJ as the "Special Prosecutor" for Treasongate offenses. I explained that Fitzgerald wears two hats, US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois AND Special Prosecutor for the Plame leak investigation. As US Attorney he can be fired at any time by Bush.As Special Prosecutor he cannot be fired. Why? Read my August 8th, 2005 article for the detailed answer including extensive links.

Fitzgerald's plenary authority was delegated to him by acting Attorney General James Comey. Two official DOJ letters were used by Comey to establish Fitzgerald as the "Acting US Attoney General" in this matter. That means he is effectively the Attorney General for this case and he doesn't have to answer to anybody.

OK, but even the Attorney General can be fired by the President. This is true. So why can't Bush fire Fitzgerald even if Fitz is the Acting Attorney General with plenary authority?

That's where the Government Accountability Office (GAO) comes in. The DOJ made a very extensive argument to the GAO that Fitzgerald has all of the power of an Independent Counsel (like Ken Starr when he was investigating Clinton). Even though the Indepenent Counsel law has expired, DOJ argued that under this set of facts and this unique delegation of power from Comey to Fitzgerald, the GAO should recognize Fitzgerald as having all the power of an Independent Counsel so that unlimited funds could be released to Fitzgerald so this investigation could be properly conducted.The GAO bought this argument and granted the funds on this basis. "

castles made of bush sands go out to SEA EVENTUALLY.

SURE wish the high tide would hasten their much needed departure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC