You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #27: nature of the a way. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
27. nature of the a way.
I think the graphic or political cartoon is "hot" media -- that is, by nature it is driving at a conclusion, its close-ended. This is different from other types of art which invite interpretation. Political art has a very clear and uninterpretable message. Therefore, it does not easily invite interpretation or analysis. And that's ok, it would be unsucessful as political art if it was ambiguous.

But because of that, it is difficult to respond either have to say "great!" which is a bit uncomfortable to do a lot of (note that not many text threads have people saying "great post", except those which are "hot" and drive to a conclusion. The ones that are more open ended and invite discussion survive longer, but have less people saying "great post".)

Also, art is subjective. Not everyone likes every work of art equally. People who don't like the work usually don't go out of their way to comment. In that way, they are being silently supportive, I suppose. And, people know that artists can sometimes be sensitive about their "babies" or creative works. Therefore, even if they had some discussion about the content of the work, or the issue, they're uncomfortable bringing it up for fear of offending the artist unnecessarily.

Or, there's people who are graphic artists by profession, like me, and feel a little awkward about giving high fives to other artists without getting into technical discussion that would bore other viewers. Also, I have always had a problem with lauding or critiquing work, as I tend to be overly honest in my assessment, since that's what I"D prefer, so I could learn something, but I find that there are many artists who when they ask your opinion of their work, only want to hear praise and get defensive if its anything but praise, and I find that awkward so I rarely go there.

However, you make a good point, so I will endeaver to comment in more graphic threads with at least an "atta-gender unspecific personage".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC