You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

The nomination has renewed a dillema I have with Roe v. Wade.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
WeRQ4U Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 12:59 PM
Original message
The nomination has renewed a dillema I have with Roe v. Wade....
Advertisements [?]
Roberts has been quoted as saying this:

"he Court's conclusion in Roe that there is a fundamental right to an abortion ... finds no support in the text, structure, or history of the Constitution."

Now everyone knows that this is, actually, quite true. There is nothing in the text of the constitution that outlines this specific fundamental right. It was the re-emergence of Substantive Due Process (a legal fiction invented by the Court) that brought about this decision. The dissenters in Roe were skeptical of it, and the arguments about it remain the same today. It obviously has dramatic effects on state's rights as well.

I am not a fan of substantive due process. I never have been. I despise legislative judiciaries regardless of which side they fall on. And I do not like the fact that judges may make decision based upon fictional clauses in an otherwise unambiguous article.

Now this is the dillema... .

I don't like the idea of states being able to prevent woman from choosing these procedures but I wholly agree with Mr. Roberts' conclusion in his opinion that the fundamental rights are not specifically availalbe in the constituion. I would prefer that Roe v. Wade NOT be overturned, however, despite my belief that it was incorrectly decided. I really have a hard time reconciling these beliefs.

What do you think? Is it reconcilable? Do you think I'm wrong? Or do you think I'm just a clueless asshole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC