You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #88: Sorry, it was the Herald, not the Trib. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005)

johnaries

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jul-10-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #84

88. Sorry, it was the Herald, not the Trib.

Candidate Outcomes Based on Potential Recounts in Florida Presidential Election 2000

Review Method : Winner
Review of All Ballots Statewide (never undertaken)
• Standard as set by each county Canvassing Board during their survey : Gore by 171
• Fully punched chads and limited marks on optical ballots : Gore by 115
• Any dimples or optical mark : Gore by 107
• One corner of chad detached or optical mark : Gore by 60

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_2000

And BTW, I know how to lie with statistics and tell the truth with statistics. I am a Six Sigma Black Belt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.