Reply #75: if he is nominated, i'll support him

[sweetheart]

Kucinich is better qualified to run a civilian democracy. Best to hire in fancy generals and samurai (ronin) not appoint the general shogun. The largest threat is militarization of america from the top down... Oh, i am not sure clark has the goodwill in him to heal the wounds america has experienced at the bush-ripoff.

I admire Mr. Clark. I'm sure he is impeccable and i find that quality noble and healthy in leadership. I see this next president like a gemstone through which all of american goodwill is going to have to shine as a gemstone to massively re-wire the tragic failure in current neoconism. If clark has one flake of egotism to be a kruschev after stalin, i am not impressed. He has to be as pure as snow to recover the truly criminal motivations exhibited by *. It concerns me that he not lose his impeccability if empowered. That said, i'm sure he's a great bloke... an outstanding VP for a democtratic contender. Militarism should not ever be the basis of the government ever.ever.ever. That bush saw fit to wear a uniform as a civilian leader stinks of those old evil farts in the cold war... and i need mr clark to stand down unilaterally across the planet in the american war on poor people. There are no excuses any longer. America needs to be civil or get nuked. The danger is truly that level i believe in a global context. It may take china and america shooting out and losing 100 million people each, just to show how much testosterone has bloodied the minds of stupid washington fools.

If clark wins, i endorse him. :-)