Reply #31: Lets do some work substitution..

[blackspade]

Shall we?

Bush's regime was far more corrupt than his predecessor. Unlike Clinton, Bush high jacked a political party and greatly centralized political power in the executive branch at the expense of the elected congress. Close allies were placed in key ministerial and military posts in order to prevent threats to the president's leadership from emerging.

In 2004, Bush ran for re-election, but his reputation for corruption made his political opponents believe the race would be fixed. As the only beneficiary of election fraud Bush was thus easily re-elected.

Well, had to alter to fit a little but similar, No?