You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Correction [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
JohnGideon Donating Member (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Correction
"Ralph Nader to audit Diebold machines in New Hampshire."

This statement is not correct. They are not just auditing the Diebold optical scan machines. In fact townships that will be checked in the first stage of recounts are also ES&S optical scan users.

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041113/NEWS02/111130045/-1/news

This article states that recounts have been asked for in only 8 communities, including Litchfield and Pelham. One of those communities is Diebold and the other ES&S. Some of the other communities may be hand-count also. Hand-counted ballots are found in a large part of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC