You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #86: The parallel with the Southern lynchings (and elsewhere) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
86. The parallel with the Southern lynchings (and elsewhere)
that today rings loudest in my ears is the yellow journalism, a key enabler then and now.

Another parallel, which I realize I bend to my purpose, is "Know-Nothingism", from the 19th century political party. The name was more about their original secrecy, when they were the secret Order of the Star Spangled Banner, which members would "know nothing" about. But I always associate their "knowingnothing" with an incapacity for self-examination, or really any examination or accounting. Like chesley #35 above, "I dunno. Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out."

http://gi.grolier.com/presidents/aae/side/knownot.html
http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article?eu=394616


And that parallels another recurrent American political theme, anti-intellectualism. I trace some of today's incarnation to former professors Gingrich, Armey and Graham.

from Todd Gitlin:

snip
Probing for historical roots of a mood that was sweeping (if somewhat exaggerated by intellectuals), Hofstadter found that "our
anti-intellectualism is, in fact, older than our national identity." He cited, among others, the Puritan John Cotton, who wrote in
1642, "The more learned and witty you bee, the more fit to act for Satan will you bee"; and Baynard R. Hall, who wrote in
1843 of frontier Indiana: "We always preferred an ignorant bad man to a talented one, and hence attempts were usually made
to ruin the moral character of a smart candidate; since unhappily smartness and wickedness were supposed to be generally
coupled, and incompetence and goodness."
snip

http://www.biology.eku.edu/RITCHISO/antiintellect.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC