You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #140: no I don't mean he put party over country [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #119
140. no I don't mean he put party over country
but rather think how impotent he would have been with Congress and the media allied against him. He'd get little done, he'd be blamed for EVERYTHING including the mess inherited from Bush, he'd be vilified like/possibly worse than Clinton (remember repukes don't suffer defeat magnanimously) and next time likely go down to defeat like Jimmy Carter against Reagan after 4 years of repuke obstructionism which would be attributed to an ineffectual Kerry and which would possibly throw the progressive half of the nation in same executive wilderness for we suffered under 12 years of Reagan-Bush I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC