You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #111: the implications of Republican electronic warfare [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
111.  the implications of Republican electronic warfare
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 11:01 PM by teryang
Crispin is right. Tab Julius is right also. The other commentaries about how stupid people are and the cultural fundie bullshit are true but the main issue, the lack of legitimacy in rigged elections is what this is all about.

Why people would accept electronic voting, voting with electrons is beyond me. Electronic warfare has matured into a very sophisticated form of warfare. Its been around for over 60 years. Recording votes by electron and reporting vote tabulations by modem is insane! There is a fundamental paradox in electronic voting that is insurmountable. It was published on for months before the electronic voting remedy (sic) to the Florida debacle in 2000 was proposed. There is a fundamental conflict between voter identity and vote secrecy and the ability to audit or recount. These two constitutional parameters cannot and will not be satisfied by BBV. Current legislators, party leadership, and judges ignore the paradox. This means that democracy is lost because the voting franchise is now owned by the corporate masters of the electronic spectrum. The meaningless and totally illegal recount rules put out by the Florida secretary state are symptomatic of the unconstitutionality of these past two election cycles.

The last sickening operational indicator of electronic warfare being used on American voting processes is that the so called Republican evoting corporations are actually controlled by defense contractors. Although not one of those defense contractors, Battelle Memorial Inc., a biowarfare defense contractor sabotaged the media consortium VNS exit polling organization in election 2002. It barely received a comment in the mainstream media when it was announced the night of the election. No exit polling! What a coinkidink! ( BMI also makes, organizes and maintains mobile units suitable for distributing and containing anthrax at any location. )

Remember that there is a litigation and judicial strategy to ban inauditable electronic voting. I proposed it right after the 2000 debacle when evoting was wrongly proposed as a remedy for Florida 2000. It will cost tens of millions and take years to implement. One has to conclude that the Democratic Party leadership just doesn't give a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC