You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #267: Right SCHRABY. There is evidence we will never get bcs we are not privy to [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #250
267. Right SCHRABY. There is evidence we will never get bcs we are not privy to
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 09:20 PM by Pallas180
Top Secret Clearance. In addition the evidence we would need
has been sealed by Junior. Which very strongly intimates that
he, on behalf of his father had a great deal to hide.

No one should forget that Halliburton was Herbert Walker's company
and Prescott Bush married Herbert Walker's daughter combining the
two families. Patterns and old habits die hard. Herbert Walker and
Prescott Bush made the family fortune by illegally financing the
purchase of armaments for Hitler's Third Reich, which they were
charged with and prohibited from certain activities for many years thereafter by FDR, who was generous and unfortunately forgiving to them.

Illegal. Illegal activities. Illegal dealings with enemies of the
State, which resulted in windfalls of illegal cash.

Patterns of behavior.

The evidence, which is sealed, would be that of confirming instructions to give to Pakistan nuclear materials, from where they spread across the Middle East, to North Korea, and the question is to where else? And what company would have been the avenue of this illegal activity?

The where else the illegal WMD was Valerie Plame's assignment.
Without question her assignment would lead to what company was involved in the illegal sale of the materials.

Although this is law that I don't know, I would venture a guess
that it would either take another president to unseal those documents, or a visit to the Supreme Court.

Where evidence of treason is involved, I would think that such
documents must be un-sealed. And Judges can unseal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC