You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #37: I understood that's what you said [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I understood that's what you said
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 10:26 PM by tom_paine
And if they do that, it is MUCH more low-key. But I believe they don't even do that much.

But, as with the Orwellian disparity in coverage between the alleged Condit murder vs the alleged Scarborough murder (both were in the House at the time), they generally don't even do that much.

check this out:

Funny how no one knows about this and EVERYONE knows about Condit.

There are hundreds of examples like this.

And I believe I explained the comments above.

One of the primary Bushevik startegies is to exploit the Death of Raygun by linking him to the Emperor*. Repetition, the Busheviks have taught, can spin lies into "conventional wisdom" as easily as they did in 1933.

Here's a Goebbels quote:

"Propagandamust always be essentially simple and repetitious. In the long run, only he will achieve basic results in influencing public opinion who is able to reduce problems to the simplest terms and who has the courage to keep forever repeating them in this simplified form despite the objections of the intellectuals."
- Joseph Goebbels diary, 1/29/42

Still works just the same now as it did then, I am sorry to say. And Whoredruff was just repeating the script not to mention try to get RR, Jr. to repeat it with her.

Do I think Whordruff was issued orders, then sat down and plotted it out just so? No, life is much more subtle than that.

I don;t know how much more I can elaborate. Do you get it now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC