Reply #46: No, I mean like Reuters or AFP or even the New York Times

[Ms. Clio]

But hey, remember how you said there weren't any forced conversions to Christianity anymore? Turns out that was just a tad incorrect.

See post #41. I consider ABC's 20/20, for example, a somewhat more reputable source than something calling itself "Cybercast News Service."

On edit: According to Cybercast News Service's "History, "Study after study by the Media Research Center, the parent organization of CNSNews.com, clearly demonstrate a liberal bias in many news outlets – bias by commission and bias by omission – that results in a frequent double-standard in editorial decisions on what constitutes "news."

The Media Research Center calls itself "The Leader in Documenting, Exposing and Neutralizing Liberal Media Bias" here: http://www.mrc.org/. And looky looky, "the MRC President Brent Bozell on FNC's Hannity & Colmes May 14, 9pm ET."

Yeah. That does tell me all I need to know about a source. Ain't research grand?