You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #32: I suspect the counterargument would be... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I suspect the counterargument would be...
...that Raygun was potentially removable by uncoerced election, whereas the Iraqis couldn't have voted Saddam out. Practically speaking, the USSR couldn't have "liberated" us from Raygun by invading -- indeed, under-armed as Iraq is, we're having quite a bit of trouble with liberation ourselves. Can you imagine the Soviets trying to occupy the USA?

Niether can I. However, it was possible for a military invasion of Iraq to remove Saddam. You don't think we had a right to do so, and others apparently disagree. Some might point out that we didn't have the right to prop his regime up, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC