Reply #42: Sorry, but you are grasping at straws...

[Devils Advocate NZ]

if the bureaucracies had that information, there would be no way to stop a response and no way to avoid having the information leak out of they tried.

Bollocks. For example Moussaoui was arrested in advance of the Sept 11 attack. Supposedly on his computer was enough evidence to have him charged as the "20th hijacker". The Sept 11 Commission even says had his case been publicised it is possible the entire attack would have been called off or delayed - possibly giving enough time to track down and arrest the conspirators.

Yet, when the agents involved - including one who directly said that he thought Moussaoui was plotting to fly planes into the WTC - applied for a FISA warrant to search the computer, someone at FBI HQ turned them down. In fact that person did everything in their power to ensure the warrant would not be given, including rewriting the application to be incorrect.

Now, to support your line of reasoning you have to manipulate the evidence by saying that the information about the attacks was gathered by the CIA/FBI and then transmitted through the ranks to the Bush Cabal - who then ordered that it be ignored.

What you are overlooking (intentionally or otherwise) is the fact that the investigations that WOULD have gathered the evidence were what was supressed, NOT the response to the gathered info. The Bush Cabal knew about the attacks NOT through official channels, but through their own back channels to the Saudi's and the Bin Laden clan.

They knew BEFORE the CIA and FBI knew, and they intentionally prevented the plan from being discovered by supressing any investigation that might have found the truth BEFORE it could do so.

In fact this is why I believe in MIHOP. They knew about the attack BEFORE the CIA or FBI could figure it out, so they must have had contacts with the people involved - the kind of contacts that would result in a "accessory" charge were it to involve any normal crime.