You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #50: That's not true AT ALL. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
50. That's not true AT ALL.
Who made you the Grand High Arbitrator of just who is and isn't a Democrat?
But since you appear to have assumed the title, perhaps it would be best if you put out a pamphlet outlining the requirements for being a true Democrat...? I'd sure hate to end up on the wrong side of the line without even knowing it.

BTW-While I'm not necessarily against gay marriage, I see it as something that will ultimately be of the greatest benefit to divorce lawyers.
I might like to see something like another level of commitment added to the mix. Whereby you could have 2 types of "marriage", both types open to both hetero- and homosexuals.

A Civil Union would be easier to get out of by either party in a sort of no-fault divorce proceeding, and could be used by any type of co-habitating couple, even relatives- and possibly even polyamorous order to take advantage of some of the legal/social/medical/etc... benefits currently allocated only to married persons.

A Marriage would be a higher level of 'commitment' open only to couples(gay or straight), but not to relatives that are not currently allowed to marry. And a divorce would be much harder to get in this type of relationship.

I'm not that personally familiar with divorce and probably naive about the process- my parents, siblings, and myself have never been through it, and the same goes for my wife and her family- although both of my parents have a sister (2 of my aunts) who has been divorced- twice each in fact.
I'm just putting this out as a rough sketch of the idea, and was wondering what thoughts and input others might have- particularly to build on the concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC