You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #46: Well there goes IHT's credibility...... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #32
46. Well there goes IHT's credibility......
.....I find their research skills lacking. :evilgrin:

From your quoted article, "No one remembers any White House ever giving it up". I wouldn't say "no one" remembered as I've posted the links to ten other examples above and they took less than a minute to find! :)

The 10 - 12 page overnight reports by the CIA were true during the Clinton Administration and it was reported by several Whitehouse 'insiders' that Bush* had them shortened to match his attention span.

This whole thread is a crock anyway in as much as the 1 1/2 pages released said all that was needed anyway. The title proved Condi a liar with the reference to Bin Laden striking in the US, (She left the word 'in' out in earlier references to the report and tried to claim that the Administration thought the attacks would be against US installations overseas.) the fact that he wanted to hi-jack airplanes and also mentions the WTC, New York and Washington DC!

Who cares how long the rest was if indeed there was anything else. The only thing missing from what has been released is the time and date of the attack. The who, what, where, how and why are ALL IN THERE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC