Reply #177: Judicial Watch?

[RedEagle]

Lots of ideas here-

What about Judicial Watch? They seem to like to go after Cheney interests.

Get on Senator and Representatives NOW to intervene. It is entirely inappropriate for an organization with:
Military involvement
Conflicts of interest
VoteHere, which stands to win by partnering with Sequoia and
could win by "helping" Diebold
Any connections, however circular, to people about to run for election, like Cheney

I wouldn't ask Rubin and Hopkins to do the analysis again. I think more credibility would be gained from people like Rivest, Schneier, those types. Diebold could always cry that, of course, Hopkins had to defend their original findings. If those findings are repeated by other people, they are dead in the water.

What about contacting the national organization of Governor's? Could we get them to put some pressure on Maryland's governor.

This reeks so bad I don't see how they can defend it. They can ignore it, but not defend it.

Reminds me of the Cheney energy task force.

Wouldn't it take a third party to evaluate the evalutations?

What about that international voting rights group, from Helsinki, I think. Could they weigh in on this?

There is a grass roots campaign here, about "Who do you want to evaluate your voting system- corporate military/industrial special interests, or computer guys?" Ads in newspapers, inserts?