Reply #451: I disagree WONDER. I think his problem with the law is an issue

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

for him.

He's a young guy and wants some definition. The only request I would have is that he look to the way he is indoctrinated in society NOT to be geared to hear a subtle NO.

I agree with him that of the woman does NOT make her intention clear it's not rape...but as I said..in the California case...that girl said "I have to go" ..nowhere could one reasonably conclude she MEANT KEEP BOINKING me.

I think he's not arguing FOR rape...he's arguing FOR clarity.

I'm asking him to BE THE ONE TO GET CLEAR AND STAY clear during the occasion. I don't think the woman (or girl as the case may be)abdicated from that same responsibility, but she may not want to hurt him even though she doesn't want to DO IT...therefore ...if it even SMELLS like no, he should respect that and stop.


I don't think AGAINST ME is stupid or ignorant. I thnk he's probably young.