Reply #280: Now how did you reach that conclusion?

[TLM]

"Some of your responses were acceptable... read through the posts here 3 other posts here have attempted to explain what it was about your posts that bothered them. They were not bothered by the fact that you were falsely accused. No one disputed that."

NSMA did, but no matter...

" What was found to be unacceptable is that you wanted affirmation that false accusation was endemic. Many of the posters on the 500+ thread while they did commiserate with your bad experience could not provide you with that affirmation that it seemed you required."

Now I do not get that. I did not want or require anybody to false accusations were endemic. What gave you that idea?





" It seemed your intention was to make women the bad guys... some are... that was never disputed... "

It seemed your intention was to make guys the bad guys... some are... that was never disputed...


"you also remained unresponsive to facts by continuing to put forth that all, many, women lie... you gave examples of how they are much more deceptive liars than men. some are... I know women that are... not all..."

Again i took great pains to point out exactly what my position was regarding my opinion on women lying. And I do not see how my opinion that women lie makes me unresponsive to facts?


"Even in this thread in more than one post I address the no yes issue as well as that type woman that does exist whom I probably sometimes despise even more than you... I guess the point is (and it seems I am not the only one that got this from your posts) is that you were projecting your rightful anger at having been falsely accused on to women in general and doing so in a way that was read as an attack (again by more than just me)."

OK I can see that one... saying all women lie can easily be seen as an attack because people assume I mean all women lie maliciously or all women always lie etc.. I tried to point out that I did not mean all women lie maliciously, but it didn't seem to do any good.




"When called on it you then accused the poster that called you on it of making personal attacks on to you, which in essence is what you yourself was doing."

I disagree... my opinions about women lying, were general. I'll grant you they coudl be taken as attacks, but there were not personal attacks. I did not fire off any personal attacks until well after I'd been hit with a "laundy list" of direct personal insults.

As I pointed out there is a difference between attacking my opinions, and attacking me for having them.


" I really do not know how to rectify this more than just me had the very same impression, and interpreted your posts in the very same way I did. I do not know what to tell you at this point."

Well at least you're trying, and that's something.