You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: Here's my understanding [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
devarsi Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Here's my understanding
You have a good point, but here's my understanding, and rational.

much of it based on info found in a Contra Costra Times artical found here: http://www.bayarea.com/mld/cctimes/news/6301273.htm

1)Davis cannot stop the recall if he waits until the last moment and then resigns. State law says that once "the recall petition is filed" the election goes forward even if Davis later resigns. The one uncertainty is what time is meant by when "the recall petition is filed." In local elections, petitions are normally filed at one time, so that point is easy to identify. But with a statewide recall, petitions are continually filed. Election law expert and Loyola Law School professor Hasen says the time might be interpreted to be when the first recall petition was filed (which has already occurred), or, on the other extreme, it might be when the recall petitions are certified (which has yet to occur).

So if Davis has time to resign, then he should, asap. The results are not certified, but they will be eventually.

2)If he resigns: If Davis resigns after "the recall petition is filed," the lieutenant governor would become governor until the recall election. If voters defeat the recall, Bustamante would remain governor. If voters approve the recall, Bustamante would give up the office to the person selected in the replacement election.

If Davis has already run out of time to stop the vote, he should STILL resign and NOW, and here is why. On resigning, Davis is gone, Bustamante is in. Without the emotional factor of getting rid of Davis, the whole issue becomes moot, and the vote factor will surely change. Why vote to get rid of the guy if he's already gone?

The Dems can actually use this to their advantage. Davis resigns, then Bustamante asks them to withdraw the petition. They either won't, or can't. But the average Joe wont think about this, they'll only think that the Repukes are responsible for the price of a useless recall vote.

If, for some reason, they CAN pull the petition, and do pull it, then the Dems get to keep the office, AND brag that they saved the taxpayers sever tens of millions of dollars.

Yeah, Davis should resign now, to either stop the vote, or build up sympathy and push for a no vote on the recall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC