You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: Ironically, I don't think they could be [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Ironically, I don't think they could be
As irregulars, I don't know if the Geneva Convention would apply. Bush and Allawi claim the resistance is not legitimate, so by that reasoning their actions don't constitute war crimes, just regular crimes.

However, occupation forces are held to certain international legal standards, so they can be charged with war crimes, at least in principle. Of course, no U.S. soldier is likely to ever be charged with a war crime, at least by any international body, given the current political situation. They may occasionally be charged by the U.S. military itself, as a few of the Abu Ghraib guards have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC