I can't understand why some here find it intolerable that OBL would have anything to say that happens to be on the mark. That doesn't mean you approve of what he does.
Just because someone is a convicted felon, for example, doesn't mean that nothing they say has any value. What's that logical fallacy? I don't have time to look it up right now. Gotta go.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
