You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: Rasmussen's Methodology Is Flawed [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Rasmussen's Methodology Is Flawed
Their stratification techniques are so rigid that there are essentially no swing voters in their sample. So, of course, they would be more stable. They are essentially constantly polling the same people.

If i call 500 hard and fast Kerry people, and 500 hard and fast Bush people, i'll get 50:50. If i use the exact same stratified random sampling technique the next day, i'll get the same result.

If i were to do this, i would automatically toss out Gallup and Rasmussen. ARC, Pew, Zogby, and ORC are the best methodology firms.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC