You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Here comes one of Tansy's questions -- [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Here comes one of Tansy's questions --
I haven't had time yet to read through the entire link, so I'm going to post this question and if you want to tell me the answer is in the link, I'll find time later to read it.

But here's the question, or maybe questions --

If this "bubble" amounts to $600 trillion with a T, who ultimately would get that money? We're talking about investments that are essentially wild ass bets at some hyperVegas roulette wheel, but when the whole thing gets paid off, someone gets the money. Someone "wins." Who is that?

If I were to walk into a Vegas casino and tell them I want to bet $100,000 on. . . .whatever. . . .they'd laugh at me. Tansy Gold doesn't have $100,000 to gamble with. Tansy Gold doesn't have $100,000 period. So they wouldn't take my bet. They'd be stupid to do so, because if I won, I'd walk away with the money, but the bigger chance is that I'd lose and they'd get nothing. But in a scenario like that, we know who the "winner" is likely to be, and the loser.

But in the derivatives game, are the holders of those $600T in markers also essentially betting that the various governments will come in and back up the bets? That's what it has seemed like to me.

And if the governments -- who are NOT backing up the universities and the pension funds -- bail out the BANKS that are making these bets, which appears to be what has happened so far, who gave the governments the right to do that? And yes, that is kind of a rhetorical question because I know how governments work. But by the same token, I think we need to look at the role government is playing -- and not just in the US -- in managing and/or manipulating the whole FIRE foundation of "the economy."

Debt as investment seems to me to be merely an off-balance-sheet euphemism for gambling for greed. Words have meanings and consequences, and I think we need to get back to calling spades spades, crooks crooks, and greedy ass selfish children who don't want to take care of their aging parents but do want to inherit all the money, well, we should call them what they are.


Tansy Gold, who got a post pulled last night for doing the latter and doesn't care. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC