You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #115: Your understanding of what I posted is flawed [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #66
115. Your understanding of what I posted is flawed
"Wind, solar, tidal and geothermal are certainly the best options (on Earth) for power generation in terms of their impact on the environment"



>>>You seem to have ignored this part of my post. Difficult to respond to you if you just copy/paste a repetition of what I already said without adding any of your own words.



"but in terms of our power needs the future almost certainly belongs to nuclear fusion technologies (that's FUSION, not fission; two very different animals)"



>>>I rightly make a distinction between FISSION and FUSION here and later, your subscription/pay-to-read report appears not to (I don't know if it does or not, I'm not a subscriber nor am I paying for a copy of the report) and the freely available supplementary data does not. It's the most frustration thing when talking about nuclear technologies: People hear the word "nuclear" and tune everything else out. Fusion is NOT fission. Hell, even some fission technologies are not what most people typically think of as fission technologies. People hear "nuclear" and think "Three Mile Island and Chernobyl" and that's the end of their thought process.



"Wind is meaningless in space and on most bodies with atmospheres (Mars has very high wind speeds, but a very thin atmosphere; atmospheres heavier than Earth's will destroy turbines in seconds) and the sun's energy gets weaker and weaker the further out you go because it is more spread out (less of the energy hits the panel). This is why probes we send out are often nuclear-powered (not in the same way as your friendly neighborhood nuclear power plant, mind you ;) ) because solar is just utterly worthless that far out. Fusion is a much safer and more efficient nuclear process and there are several proof-of-concept projects being planned or built right now, different technologies competing for bragging rights to being the first to produce a viable model for commercial production."



>>>As fusion power generation takes root, it can produce far greater amounts of electricity on smaller footprints than any given solar/wind/tidal plant could ever hope to produce, on Earth or off. Barring exotic forms of energy (matter/antimatter, zero-point energies, micro black holes, magic), utilizing fusion is in the cards as our main source of large-scale electricity production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC